Transparency

Transparency & accountability · The Barayamal case files

Follow the paper trail.

Since 2023 Barayamal has used Freedom of Information law to open the files behind decisions made in the name of First Nations people — a resort sold, grants awarded, complaints buried, data withheld. Each case below is a real investigation, running in public on Right to Know.

23requests filed
12agencies questioned
9/20refused outright
3now before the OAIC

No files match — clear the search or pick another status.

CASE 01 · OPENED SEP 20257 FILES

The Ayers Rock Resort sale

In 2011 the Indigenous Land Corporation bought Ayers Rock Resort for around $300 million. In 2025 the ILSC sold it to Journey Beyond. Who valued it, who approved it, what the Commonwealth knew, and what conditions FIRB attached — none of it has been volunteered. Seven requests across four agencies are prying the file open. So far: refusals nearly across the board, and the matter now sits with the Information Commissioner.

Sep 2025

Five requests filed with the ILSC, Finance and the NIAA.

Oct 2025

Refused across the board — ILSC and Finance decline release.

Feb 2026

Fresh request to Treasury for the FIRB case file on the acquisition.

Apr 2026

Internal review upholds Treasury’s refusal.

Now

OAIC review application lodged. The Commissioner decides next.

CASE 02 · OPENED FEB 20264 FILES

Integrity inside the agencies

What we asked

How agencies that decide First Nations outcomes handle their own nepotism, conflict-of-interest and discrimination complaints.

Where it stands

NIAA and DFAT released documents with redactions. Creative Australia refused outright.

What came out

After a contested charges estimate, NIAA released document binders on both requests; DFAT released its records under LEX 13418 with exemptions. Read them yourself:

CASE 03 · OPENED FEB 20264 FILES

Who gets the money?

What we asked

Whether “Indigenous” funding reaches Indigenous-owned and community-controlled organisations — and the data that would prove it either way.

Where it stands

One clean win: Education released the HELP-debt tables in full. The other three are contested at review or before the OAIC.

What came out

Refused at first, released in full on internal review: aggregate HELP student-debt data by Indigenous status — figures that weren’t public before.

CASE 04 · OPENED JAN 20235 FILES

The land council round

What we asked

Records of the administration imposed on Red Chief Local Aboriginal Land Council in Gunnedah — our founder’s own land council — under NSW GIPA law.

Where it stands

Refused or “not held” at nearly every turn. The round that taught us to ask in public.

How an FOI request works

1
We ask, in publicLodged through Right to Know, so the question and every reply are permanently on the record.
2
The agency must decideRoughly 30 days to release documents, redact them, or refuse — citing reasons.
3
We appeal refusalsInternal review first; unresolved matters go to the Information Commissioner (OAIC).
“Public money spent in the name of First Nations people deserves First Nations scrutiny.”

Barayamal Limited is an ACNC-registered charity. We file every request openly, appeal every unjustified refusal, and publish whatever comes back — releases, redactions and all.

⊘ 3 further requests are under embargo while agencies respond. New case files appear here the day they conclude.

About these requests. Every request in these case files was made under the Freedom of Information Act 1982 (Cth) or the Government Information (Public Access) Act 2009 (NSW), through the public Right to Know platform, by or on behalf of Barayamal Limited — an ACNC-registered charity (ABN 13 618 487 139). Where access is refused, we use the review rights those Acts provide: internal review, then the Office of the Australian Information Commissioner. If anything here is out of date or incorrect, contact us and we will fix it.

Statuses sourced from Right to Know · snapshot taken 23 July 2026 · the live record updates there first.